kurt.games

Gaming coverage from someone who actually plays, with opinions and zero corporate polish.

News

War in the North Just Got Shadow Dropped and Nobody Was Ready For It

War in the North Just Got Shadow Dropped and Nobody Was Ready For It

Aspyr dropped The Lord of the Rings: War in the North Legacy Edition today with basically zero warning. August 11, 2026. Just... there. Available on Xbox Series X|S, PS5, Nintendo Switch, Switch 2, and PC at $17.99 until August 25, after which it bumps to $19.99.

Shadow drops are usually reserved for games people are actually waiting for. This one feels different. Like someone found a box in the attic.

The Original Was Actually Good And You Forgot About It

November 2011. That's when War in the North came out on 360, PS3, and PC. The same month as Modern Warfare 3 and Skyrim. It never had a chance. You were either shooting people online or climbing mountains yelling at dragons. Nobody was playing an action RPG co-op LOTR game.

IGN gave it a 7/10 at the time. That's not a bad score. That's a "solid game that got buried" score.

The pitch was interesting: the story runs parallel to the books and Peter Jackson films, not through them. You're not playing Frodo. You're playing three original characters doing their own thing while the main events happen elsewhere. And Aspyr used actor likenesses from the films, so it actually looked like it belonged in that world.

Also worth knowing: it was the first Lord of the Rings game rated M for Mature. The EA published LOTR games from the 2000s were all sanitized. This one had actual violence. For a franchise built on war and death, that felt right.

What's Actually New In The Legacy Edition

60fps. That's the big one. The original was running on 360 and PS3 hardware, so getting a locked 60 on modern consoles matters more than it sounds for an action game.

Lock-on targeting is new. If you played the original you know why this matters. The camera could be a mess in combat and you'd lose track of what you were hitting.

Hot swap between characters is also in. You're playing with three characters total, co-op online for the full thing. Being able to switch between them on the fly in single player changes how you approach builds and fights.

Online co-op is still there from the original. That hasn't changed. The whole game supports it.

The Price Is Hard To Argue With

$17.99 for two weeks. $19.99 after that. This is published by Warner Bros., developed by Aspyr, who do this kind of work regularly. For a 15-year-old game with meaningful quality-of-life improvements and 60fps, that's a reasonable ask. You're not buying a $70 new release. You're buying something that got overlooked and deserves another shot at $18.

If you have people to play it with online, it's easier to recommend. Solo it's still fine but co-op is clearly what the game was designed around.

Aspyr Hinted At More LOTR Re-Releases

The press release apparently teased additional Lord of the Rings re-releases without naming them. This could mean anything. The EA era had a lot of games. Return of the King, The Two Towers, Battle for Middle-earth. Some of those hold up. Some definitely don't. Worth watching if you have any attachment to that era of LOTR games.

War in the North was the right starting point though. It's the one that aged cleanest and had the most original content that wasn't just the movie plot you already know.

Should You Get It

If you missed it in 2011 and you like action RPGs with online co-op, yes. $17.99 is not a gamble. The 60fps upgrade alone makes it worth it over digging out old hardware.

If you played it back then and liked it, probably yes. The targeting fix and character swapping fix real problems the original had.

If you have no interest in LOTR or co-op action games, nothing here changes that.

It came out the same month as Skyrim and never got a fair shot. Fifteen years later it gets another one. That's about as good a second chance as a 2011 game can ask for.

Source: Ign